NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
NGT is a tightly structured, facilitated process
which produces a ranked list of ideas. Groups of 5 to 9
participants are presented a single question,then led through
a six step process.
-
Silent generation of ideas in writing
(8 minutes)
-
Round-robin recording of ideas (20 minutes)
-
Serial discussion for clarification (20
minutes)
-
Preliminary vote on item importance (10
minutes)
-
Discussion of the preliminary vote (20
minutes)
-
Final vote (10 minutes)
The final vote reflects group consensus on
the highest ranked ideas.
Although NGT does not allow true discussion,
it has the advantage of controlling overly talkative people
and it minimizes status differences that might influence
other kinds of group meetings.
|
"It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations,
if you live near him." --J.R. Tolkien
|
Communication Tips: #1 - #2
- #3 - #4
|
|
SPIRIT: Defusing High School Tension
Before It Starts
The SPIRIT program is a technique designed to anticipate
and prevent high school violence. The acronym stands for Student
Problems--Identifying and Resolving Issues Together. Steven Thom,
of the community resources division at DOJ, developed the program
and helped as the Sacramento Police Department facilitated it in
several Sacramento high schools.
This program brought together student leaders--of
both student councils and gangs--to discuss their school's problems
and to seek solutions using the Nominal Group Technique method.
The students and officers met for two days at an off-campus sit.
Typically the programs involved about 100 students for each high
school.
Believing that students who were with others of a
similar ethnic background would speak more freely of the problems
they encounter, on the first day of these programs student groups
were ethnically formed. Their task was to identify safety problems
in their school. Each group's list was shared with the whole group.Facilitators
selected problems identified by multiple groups to serve as the
stimuli for the second day.
On day two, the students were rearranged into ethnically
integrated groups to generate solutions. As the second day ended,
student representatives were assigned to work with their principal
to try to implement some of the solutions generated.
Each group began with ice breaking activities to help
the students feel comfortable with one another. This was especially
important on Day 2.
The meetings served as a way to empower students and
to awaken them to civic responsibility. What changes occurred from
the meetings, however, depended heavily on school administration
and on the students themselves. To encourage such change, neighborhood
police officers and the school administration monitored the progress.
|