Portfolio Home | San Juan Portfolio Home

Criteria that enables movement to the Review Portfolio

Artifacts moved to the Review Portfolio must have progressed through the following process.

Personal Reflection Statements:

What is the purpose of this artifact?
- Describe the intended audience, basic goals and objectives, fit into the curriculum.
How has this artifact been utilized, tested or otherwise reviewed?
How has this artifact been modified from its initial form?
- How have the basic goals and objectives changed?
- What changes have been made in the activity?
- On what bases were the changes made?
What effect has this artifact had on students, faculty and / or others?
Based on your reflections,
- what additional changes might you make in this artifact?
- what future activities or projects might you undertake?

Peer Review:

Which cohort colleagues have reviewed your artifact? At least two peers must review your artifact.
- What guidance (e.g., statement of goals and objectives, rubric) did you give them for the review?
What comments and suggestions have cohort colleagues given you?
What modifications have you made as a result of this peer review?
Has this artifact been presented in a conference or staff development setting?
- If so, describe the setting, audience, and data gathering [feedback?] techniques.

Note: The feedback from a conference or staff development setting may substitute for a cohort peer review.

Faculty Review:

Which faculty members have reviewed your artifact? At least one faculty member must review your artifact.
- What guidance (e.g., statement of goals and objectives, rubric) did you give them for the review?
What comments and suggestions have faculty members given you?
What modifications have you made as a result of this faculty review?

Review of Literature:

At least four full-text library or online references must be cited in APA format for each artifact. The review of literature for the Action Research project must be more comprehensive and extensive. See guidelines.