ANTH 1
Introduction to Physical Anthropology
Study Guide #3
Last Updated: May 16, 2000
Return
to Strasser Home Page,
Anthro. Dept. Phys.
Anthro. Home Page , ANTH1
Home Page.
Major Events in Primate Evolution during the
Cenozoic: - Paleocene (65-55 mya):
- Possible (archaic) primates
appear; now considered by many to be non-primates; found in N. America and Europe
-
Eocene (55-35 mya):
- True primates appear, characterized by nails
and grasping ability, postorbital bar, stereoscopic vision, large brain
-
Two groups recognized:
- adapids, which are ancestral to living lemurs
and lorises, found in N. America, Europe, N. Africa and China
- omomyids,
which are ancestral to living tarsiers and anthropoids, found in N. America and
Europe
- Oligocene (35-25 mya):
- Anthropoids appear,
characterized by postorbital closure, closed metopic suture and closed mandibular
symphysis, color vision, diurnal life style, sexual dimorphism
- Found
primarily in Jebel el Qatrani Formation of Faym, Egypt
- New World monkeys
appear in South America later in Oligocene
- Miocene (25-5 mya):
- Old World Monkeys (OWM) and apes appear in E. Africa; apes dominate
-
Living apes characterized by lack of tail, suspensory abilities
-
Pliocene (5-1.5 mya):
- OWM spread, apes decline, hominids appear
-
Hominids characterized by suite of features related to bipedalism & incisor-like
canines
- Pleistocene (1.5 mya – 10,000 ya)
- Homo
spreads
- Characterized by larger brain and capacity for culture
Plate
Tectonics: - Structure of Earth: Core, Mantle, Crust
- Convection
currents in mantle, in part, drive movements of crustal plates
- In Mesozoic
all continents joined into Pangaea - earth warm all over
- Division of
Pangaea into Gondwanaland and Laurasia; then division of Gondwanaland into S.
America & Africa by opening of S. Atlantic, Madagascar breaks off, India heading
North towards Laurasia; Laurasia splits into N. America and Eurasia by opening
of N. Atlantic; then India smacks into belly of Asia, uplifting Himalaya Mts.
Dating
methods: - Absolute methods
- Non-radiometric
-
dendrochronology (tree ring dating)
- 1 ring = 1 year
- date
fossil trees
- Varves
- lake sediments
- varve
made up of 2 bands: bottom coarse-grained; top fine-grained
- 1 varve =
1 year
- Radiometric methods
- atomic structure
- atom made of central nucleus and surrounding shells
- nucleus = protons
(+ charge) and neutrons (0 charge)
- shells = electrons (- charge)
-
protons and neutrons have mass/weight whereas electrons do not
- elements
differ from each other in that their atoms have a different number of protons
in their nucleus (i.e., atomic number)
- the atoms of a particular element
(e.g., oxygen, carbon etc.) have the same number of protons (atomic number), but
may have different number of neutrons (yielding different atomic weights); if
there are variants of an atom they are called ISOTOPES
- some isotopes
may be unstable and disintegrate over time in to the atom of another element;
disintegration occurs by protons capturing an electron and becoming a neutron
or by neutrons breaking into protons and electrons; in either case the number
of protons changes in the nucleus
- the HALF-LIFE of radioactive isotopes
refers to the amount of time it takes for one-half of the atoms to decay in to
the atoms of another element
- Potassium/Argon (K/Ar)
-
half-life = 1.3 by
- date volcanic rocks, not fossils themselves
-
when volcanic rock is hot all the argon in the rock "evaporates" off, so that
when the rock cools there is no argon in it; thus, whatever argon is found in
a volcanic rock is there because it was produced by potassium decaying in to argon
-
used to date age of Earth as well as hominid localities
- examine the ratio
of K to Ar
- Carbon 14 (14C)
- half-life = 5730 years
-
date fossils, not rocks
- a) plants absorb equal amounts of 14C and
12C during their lives; when plants die 14C decays in to nitrogen while 12C remains
stable
- used to date things up to 50 kya
- examine the ratio
of 14C to 12C
- Relative methods
- Assumptions:
- Principle of Superposition
- strata higher in a column are younger
than those lower in the sequence
- Principle of Uniformitarianism
- can infer what the paleo-landscapes were by the typeof rock left; e.g., limestone
represents deep water; shale represents coastal shelf; sandstone represents ancient
beach, etc.
- Biostratigraphy
- Use biological organisms
within strata to correlate different sites
- Paleomagnetism
- the position of the poles have changed through time; we are currently in
a Normal Chron but there have also been Reversed Chrons
- Flourine
dating
- bones that are buried at the same time should have equal
amounts of flourine in them
- used to prove that Piltdown Man was
a hoax
- Climate Reconstruction:
- Oxygen Isotope
Analysis
- 18O is heavier than 16O; therefore,
water (H2O) with 18O is lower in the water column than is
water with 16O
- microscopic organisms that live in the water
column use oxygen in constructing their exoskeletons (shells);
- during
cold periods when glaciers exist, water is bound up in the ice and the sea level
drops
- by examining the type of oxygen in the shells of organisms that
live near the top of the water column, we can tell whether the period during which
they lived was cold or warm
Physics of Stability: -
relationship of height of center of gravity (CG) of body relative to width/size
of base of support
- High CG and small Base = unstable (e.g., ballerina,
some floor lamps)
- Low CG and large Base = stable (e.g., sumo wrestler,
high-chair, some table lamps)
- Biomechanical constraints on arboreal
locomotion:
- branches are narrow, so base of support for a primate
is limited
- can modify height of CG by: having shorter legs or flexing
legs at elbow and knees
- can modify width of base of support by moving
legs/feet onto a nearby branch
- Lack of biomechanical constraints
in terrestrial environment:
- ground is continuous, so base of support
for a primate is unlimited
- because there are no limits to the base of
support, animals can afford to heighten CG;
- Can heighten CG by lengthening
legs
- advantage of long legs is that speed is a function of:
- rate of stride (how often legs move)
- length of stride (distance
covered by one leg)
Characteristics of all hominids compared
to other hominoids: - The distinctive difference between hominids
and apes relates to locomotion: hominids are bipedal, whereas apes are
quadrupedal
- modifications of skeleton for bipedal walking
- vertebral column S-shaped with anterior lumbar curve
- consequence
of curvature is to bring body mass directly above knees and feet at midline
-
hip modified to balance body over one supporting foot
- pelvis curved
anteroposteriorly rather than along back of body or from side to side, so
-
gluteus maximus muscle functions as an extensor of the hip
- gluteus medius
and minimus are abducters of trunk, keeping the trunk from falling to the unsupported
side; in apes these muscles are extensors of the hip
- femur modified
to bring knees to midline
- thus hominids have a "carrying angle"
that does not equal 90 degrees, whereas in apes the carrying angle=90 degrees
-
large calf muscles compared to apes
- foot modified to bear total body
weight, rather than body weight being shared by four limbs as in apes
- transverse arch, as seen in all primates, and
- longitudinal arch,
unique to bipedal hominids
- very short toes (not needed for grasping)
-
big toe bound/adducted to other toes
- concealed ovulation/continued
sexual receptivity
- related to bipedalism, loss of sexual swellings
-
related to incisiform canines; loss of honing triad
- honing triad:
- canines large and projecting;
- upper canine honed against lower anterior
premolar and lower canine; so worn on anterior and posterior sides
- lower
canine fits into diastema between upper canine and lateral incisor;
- anterior
premolar is unicuspid;
- large canines in non-human primates used in male-male
competition and in establishing dominance heirarchies
- human canine
complex:
- canines look like incisors (incisiform)
- canines
occlude apically (at top), so worn only apically
- no diastema
-
lower anterior premolar is bicuspid
Hypotheses for Origin
of Bipedalism: - Gathering hypothesis - based on ethnographic data of
hunters-gatherers that females provide the vast majority of food (i.e., veggies)
for families, because hunting for meat is not always a successful endeavor. Suggests
that previous hypotheses ignored the role of females.
- Scavenging hypothesis
- based on fact that hominids had no known tools when bipedalism evolved; supporting
evidence provided by later archaelogoical record, when tools were known, by superposition
of tool cut marks over animal tooth marks on bones.
- Reproductive hypothesis
- based on fact that apes have an interbirth interval of approximately 6 years,
whereas humans can have an interbirth interval of approximately one year, IF the
males provision the females. Suggests that monogamy and male-male bonding were
important in the origin of bipedalism.
- problem: what if one male
cheated and did not engage with other males in hunting but instead inseminated
females. Monogamy would lead to cuckoldry!
- relationship of relative testes
size and sexual dimorphism to social organization:
- orangs solitary,
females come into heat once every 6 years, great deal of sexual dimorphism and
male-male competition for access to females; very small testes.
- chimps
gregarious and promiscuous, females come into heat once every 6 years, all males
copulate with female in heat; strong male-male bonding, little sexual dimorphism,
very large testes due to sperm competition
- humans; male-male bonding
strong; minor sexual dimorphism; female choice for mates; testes similar to those
of monogamous gibbons in relative size; females may have selected for large penis
in males (maybe related to female orgasm, which is unique in primates, we think)
Hominid
species: - genera Ardipithecus & Australopithecus:
- cranial capacity 450-500 cc
- Primitive group
- Ardipithecus
ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, A. anamensis
- trail
of footprints at Laetolil, Tanzania
- some curvature of phalanges, suggesting
some climbing activity
- Primitive dental features related to honing triad:
- diastema between upper incisors and canine
- canine worn on apex and
posterior surface (intermediate between apes and other hominids)
- first
premolar not fully bicuspid
- Age: 4.5 mya - 3.0 mya
- Sites:
E. Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania)
- Gracile group
-
Australopithecus africanus
- Dentally similar to us
- incisors and canines large relative to cheek teeth
- premolars narrow
relative to molars: stepped condition
- Age: 3 - 2 mya
- Sites:
S. Africa (Sterkfontein, Makapansgat, Taung [Taung child])
- Robust
group
- Paranthropus (P. robustus, P. boisei,
P. aethiopicus)
- Dental condition
- incisors and canines
relatively tiny compared to cheek teeth
- premolars relatively wide compared
to molars: continuous condition; serves to increase surface area for chewing seeds
etc.
- large chewing muscles; so large cheek bones (for masseter muscles)
and a sagittal crest (for temporalis muscles)
- Age: 2.5 - 1 mya
-
P. boisei & P. aethiopicus are from E. Africa (Olduvai Gorge,
Lake Turkana); P. robustus is from S. Africa (Swartkrans, Kromdraai)
-
Leapord Hypothesis to explain origin of S. African cave sites
- genus
Homo
- Homo habilis/rudolfensis
- East Africa
(Olduvai Gorge, Lake Turkana) and S. Africa (Swartkrans) at 2.5 - 1.7 mya
-
Cranial capacity: 800 cc
- strictly bipedal
- hand capable of precision
grip and making tools.
- Culture
- Oldowan Industry
- Chopper-Chopping tools
- core tools, with a few flakes taken
off
- scavengers
- Homo ergaster/erectus
- East Africa (Olduvai Gorge, Lake Turkana) at 1.7 mya
- Asia at 700
kya: China (Zhoudoukian Cave); Java
- Morphology
- Thick bones
-
cranial capacity approx 1000 cc
- occipital and sagittal keels
-
strong brow ridges
- Culture
- controlled fire
-
Tools: Acheulian Industry
- Big-game hunting
- clothes likely
-
skin color? probably becoming lighter (UV etc) as moved out of Africa
-
Homo heidelbergensis (transitional forms)
- Time Range: 700
- 135 kya; Africa, Europe, Asia
- cranial capacity approx 1250 cc
-
Intermediate in all senses between Homo erectus, H. neanderthalensis
and H. sapiens
- Tools: Acheulean
- H. neanderthalensis
- Time Range: 135 - 35 kya
- Geographical Range: peri-Mediterranean
-
Morphology
- Cranial capacity: approx 1550 cc
- Mid-facial
prognathism
- very wide, large nasal aperture
- sloping cheekbones
-
incisors worn labially
- occipital bun
- Stocky body build (related
to cold)
- Hollow brow ridges; round orbits
- Culture
- Buried dead (graves with pollen)
- Tools
- Mousterian
Industry
- flake tools, not cores
- LeVallois Technique - mass
production of tool types
- Homo sapiens
- Time Range: 100 kya - present
- Geographical Range: World wide
-
Morphology
- cranial capacity: approx 1400 cc
- vertical forehead
-
chin
- Culture
- art
- tools
- blades,
complex compound tools (bow & arrow etc.)
Models
for Origin of Homo sapiens: - Multiregional Model
- Out
of Africa Model (Population Replacement Model)
Anatomy of Human Speech.
- Chimps:
- have long, thin tongue & short pharynx (supralaryngeal
space);
- can drink and breathe at same time
- Humans:
- as adults have short, thick tongue & long pharynx
- as babies
have short, thick tongue, but a short pharynx