Rubrics The sample below is a good example of a generic rubric that would work for just about any lesson. Below that are some possible ideas that you could use for a rubric for assessing a lesson plan. Look at the Criteria and choose some that make sense to you. There is no right or wrong, so to speak |
These
are 4 generic examples - You need to have at least two that have a
technology focus. |
Criteria | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Your Score |
Grade Level Appropriateness |
Objectives and activities are inappropriate for the intended grade level. |
Some, but not all, objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. |
Most objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. |
All objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. |
1 2 3 4 |
Instructional Activities |
Activities are unrelated to objectives. Many activities are extraneous and irrelevant. No attempt is made to individualize activities for learning styles or strengths. |
Activities relate peripherally to objectives. Some activities are extraneous or irrelevant. Activities are not accessible to students with different learning styles and strengths. |
Activities relate to objectives. A few activities may be extraneous or irrelevant. Activities are accessible to students of more than one learning style of strength. |
Activities provide a logical path to meeting objectives. No activities are extraneous or irrelevant. Students of many learning styles and strengths can benefit from activities. |
1 2 3 4 |
Objectives |
Objectives are missing, unclear, or are unrelated to standards. |
Objectives do not provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Some of the objectives are related to standards. |
Objectives provide some sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Most of the objectives are related to standards. |
Objectives provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. All objectives are clearly and closely related to standards. |
1 2 3 4 |
Standards |
No standards are mentioned in lesson. Lesson is not related to standards. |
Standards are alluded to in lesson, and lesson is related to standards. |
Some relevant standards are referenced. Lesson is influenced by standards. Too many or too few standards are included. (Lesson may name many standards instead of focusing on important, key standards; alternately, lesson may not name relevant key standards). |
Key standards are referenced. Lesson is guided by standards. |
1 2 3 4 |
Sample Criteria - These came from students, some may be similar criteria, these are just examples of the different wording and approaches used to build a rubric. |
Criteria | Example of good score |
Resources | Resources needed for this lesson, notes about assembling materials, contacting outside guests, or locating additional resources are included. |
Examples | 3-4 examples that perfectly represent
the objectives of the lesson. Students have a visual idea of the purpose of the lesson. |
Teacher-Created Supporting Materials |
Supporting materials and student handouts are clear, complete, and appealing to students. Materials enhance lesson significantly. |
Integration of Technology |
Selection and application of technologies is appropriate for learning environment and outcomes. Technologies applied to enhance learning. |
Time Allotment | Objectives can be accomplished in the time allotted. Enrichment is available to advanced students. |
Technology | Technology significantly increases student understanding of the lesson and supports the lessons main objectives. |
Technology Presentation | Visuals: fonts, graphics, and color are clear, and easy to read |
Technology clarity and connections |
Use of technology is clearly connected
to the lesson and used or presented in an appropriate time which allows students to learn |