Rubrics

The sample below is a good example of a generic rubric that would work for just about any lesson. Below that are some possible ideas that you could use for a rubric for assessing a lesson plan. Look at the Criteria and choose some that make sense to you. There is no right or wrong, so to speak

These are 4 generic examples - You need to have at least two that have a technology focus.
Criteria Your Score
Grade Level Appropriateness
Objectives and activities are inappropriate for the intended grade level. 
Some, but not all, objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. 
Most objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. 
All objectives and activities are appropriate for the intended grade level. 
1

2

3

4
Instructional Activities
Activities are unrelated to objectives. Many activities are extraneous and irrelevant. No attempt is made to individualize activities for learning styles or strengths. 
Activities relate peripherally to objectives. Some activities are extraneous or irrelevant. Activities are not accessible to students with different learning styles and strengths. 
Activities relate to objectives. A few activities may be extraneous or irrelevant. Activities are accessible to students of more than one learning style of strength. 
Activities provide a logical path to meeting objectives. No activities are extraneous or irrelevant. Students of many learning styles and strengths can benefit from activities. 
1

2

3

4
Objectives
Objectives are missing, unclear, or are unrelated to standards. 
Objectives do not provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Some of the objectives are related to standards. 
Objectives provide some sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Most of the objectives are related to standards. 
Objectives provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. All objectives are clearly and closely related to standards. 
1

2

3

4
Standards
No standards are mentioned in lesson. Lesson is not related to standards.  
Standards are alluded to in lesson, and lesson is related to standards.  
Some relevant standards are referenced. Lesson is influenced by standards. Too many or too few standards are included. (Lesson may name many standards instead of focusing on important, key standards; alternately, lesson may not name relevant key standards). 
Key standards are referenced. Lesson is guided by standards.  
1

2

3

4
Sample Criteria - These came from students, some may be similar criteria, these are just examples of the different wording and approaches used to build a rubric.
Criteria Example of good score
Resources Resources needed for this lesson, notes about assembling materials, contacting outside guests, or locating additional resources are included.
Examples 3-4 examples that perfectly represent the
objectives of the lesson. Students have a visual idea of the purpose of the lesson.
Teacher-Created
Supporting
Materials
Supporting materials and student handouts are clear, complete, and appealing to students. Materials enhance lesson significantly.
Integration of
Technology
Selection and application of technologies is appropriate for learning environment and outcomes. Technologies applied to enhance learning.
Time Allotment Objectives can be accomplished in the time allotted. Enrichment is available to advanced students.
Technology Technology significantly increases student understanding of the lesson and supports the lessons main objectives.
Technology Presentation Visuals: fonts, graphics, and color are clear, and easy to read
Technology
clarity and
connections
Use of technology is clearly connected to the lesson and used or presented in an
appropriate time which allows students to learn