Personal Savings
The personal savings
rate is one of the numerous statistics the government gives us every month and
it is essentially what’s left of our income after we pay taxes, mortgage, car
payments, living expense, etc. In 1946 the United States started for the first
time to gather personal savings data so it could be used for economic research.
Throughout the history of personal savings in the United States, American’s had
a positive savings rate. But, just recently, personal
savings actually fell to zero the last three months of 1998 and went into
negative territory in February, 1999.
In the early-1950’s to the mid-1970’s personal savings rates did see a slight growth rate which was around eight percent of personal disposable income. After this growth in personal savings, there has been a downward trend that hit its peak in late 1998. This trend has been mostly overlooked because of the strength of the overall economy. Some economist speculate that this downward trend in savings starting from 1975.
Some
economics say that savings plays an intricate role in our economy because it
critical to capital formation. Capital formation is crucial for our economic
growth and rising wages. This is point is illustrated by almost every economist
theory. Since savings is the basis of how money is borrowed, it makes it
possible to build factories, purchase equipment, conduct research, and develop
technology.
The trend of lack of savings in the United States is a great concern because it can have a negative effect on today’s worker. In the short-run when workers spend all their disposable income while saving little, the economy would prosper. But, in the long-run when these workers retiree, they won’t have adequate savings for all their retirement needs which include health care and living expenses. Experts conclude you will need approximately 60 percent to 80 percent of your current income each year to address all your retirement requirements. The typical American depends on multiply sources for their retirement needs. Generally, these sources come from Social Security, employer provided retirement benefits, and personal savings. Due to the present state of Social Security, it might become insolvent for future generations and might not be guaranteed to be there in the future. While employer provided retirement benefits are also a good source for retirement income, it probably won’t have a large enough cash flow for your retirement. Well-managed personal savings can protect you from any short falls there might be in the future.
When you compare the United States savings rate to other developed countries you find that America is at the bottom of the heap. The chart below illustrates this point.
The chart below shows you the percentage of savings to GDP in 1996 for several countries. Again, the U.S. ranks among the lowest with its savings percentage of 15%.
|
GDP |
Savings as
Percentage of GDP |
Switzerland |
$171b. |
28% |
Japan |
$2,668b. |
34% |
U.S. |
$6,738b. |
15% |
Singapore |
$66b. |
52% |
France |
$1,147b. |
21% |
Germany |
$1,643b. |
22% |
Hong Kong |
$140b. |
30% |
Brunei |
$5.9b. |
35% |
Australia |
$340b. |
19% |
Italy |
$1,064b. |
20% |
Canada |
$619b. |
19% |
Britain |
$1,054b. |
15% |
Macau |
$6.7b. |
28% |
New Zealand |
$60b. |
24% |
Taiwan |
$279b. |
27% |
South Korea |
$468b. |
35% |
Saudi Arabia |
$208b. |
27% |
Malaysia |
$171b. |
34% |
Brazil |
$921b. |
21% |
South Africa |
$160b. |
19% |
Mexico |
$650b. |
17% |
Thailand |
$408b. |
37% |
Fiji |
$4.3b. |
19% |
Iran |
$328b. |
30% |
The current way the government measures personal savings
rate is up for debate. Numerous organizations and individuals say it’s an
inaccurate interpretation of the real savings rate for a few reasons. The
present system currently ignores buildups in mutual funds and those of tax
sheltered 401(k). It also neglects individual retirement accounts. Another fact
is it doesn’t take into account the Social Security payroll taxes that are
being paid for the present year. It is estimated that 126 billion of it is
beyond what is being paid out for benefits. Finally, the current statistics
count pension plan contributions that employers make to a worker's account as
"personal income" to the worker, even though it wont be paid for
years.
A revised
statistically working of personally savings paints a different story. The Bureau
of Economic Analysis decided to recalculate the PSR. Instead of putting
government workers retirement plans into the category of government savings,
they put it into personal savings. Once this was done, the personal saving rate
didn’t like so menacing. The graph
below illustrates this point.
Having a low
savings rate isn’t necessarily a bad thing; it does have its pros and cons. It
does allow for consumption demand to grow beyond the increase in income.
However, having a low savings rate also has a bad side to it. The negative part
of it is U.S. current account (trade balance) has a higher deficit.
Economically speaking you can look at a low savings a few different ways. In
terms of retirement, it is absolutely necessary for people to increase their
savings. Given the current condition of Social Security and Medicare in terms
of becoming insolvent, it makes it more necessary for people to start saving
more.