THE VALUES AND
ETHICS OF ORGANIC FARMING
by Stan Dundon
Organic farmers, as a group, have a
serious moral obligation to come together and agree on a strong and rich
statement of the many values it provides, or has the potential to provide, the
public. They also have an obligation to form a consensus with public
constituencies sharing those values on
the practical principles needed to preserve those values. These values and the
mutual ethical principles which preserve them are the real "soul" of
good farming as an honorable and indispensable vocation. The Soul of Agriculture Project was formed
by family farmers, many of them organic, leaders of rural communities,
churches, farm labor, environmental and farm animal welfare leaders to help in
the process of forming just such a broad
farm--public consensus on the values and ethical commitments of family managed
farming. Its work and history is viewable at www.soulofag.org.
In this article I will do three
things: 1.) Indicate reasons for the urgency of organic farmers and their
constituencies to form an explicit consensus on the values and ethics of their
vocation, 2.) Suggest a "content framework " for consensus formation
derived from work done by the Soul of
Agriculture initiators, 3.) Give examples, with the framework, of outstanding values in organic farming and
ethical principles which farmers have already located to preserve those values.
Urgency
1. Family managed farming, organic and
conventional, is in crisis in many areas because policy makers and the general public do not
know what values would be lost if industrial agriculture swept the field of all
family operations. Until recently organic agriculture has been almost exclusively
family-sized operations. Many of the values located in organic farming will
have an extremely difficult time surviving in an industrial context. How to
protect those values as organic operations scale up to sizes needed to supply
public demand will be at most hit-and-miss without explicit agreement on those
values and the guiding principles which preserve them. These are the real
"soul" of organic farming.
2. When industrial firms co-opt the technical
recipe which entitles their market
product to organic certification, the neglect of a whole range of other values
is almost, but not necessarily, certain. Public policy makers cannot be
expected to know why this loss of the soul of organic farming is even important
if its supporters have not formed a single voice and basic message to express it. The
industrial operations are likely to continue the degree of commitment to
environmental, labor, farm family, rural community, farm animal welfare values
which has been traditional to their corporate culture. And successful family
operations, in scaling up, will be strongly tempted to ape the corporate culture
rather than to preserve that of their own tradition.
3. The industrial segment hoping to profit by new
genetic technologies find the market for foods derived from genetically modified organisms (GMOs) threatened by the success of the principle of free
choice in foods represented by the "organic section" in the grocery
store. The GMO community has launched an open attack on the value of family
farming. It needs to be defended explicitly.
4. If public policy makers can be guided by an
explicit, broadly supported consensus on the values and ethics of organic
farming, so can the individual members of the organic farming community. It is
extremely animating, encouraging, unifying and rededicating to review the
rock-bottom values of a specific vocation, especially one which is arduous,
innovative, under attack , and economically risky. A really solid answer to
"Why am I doing this?" is a great thing.
Framework
The following content framework is taken from the
first and second TASKS of the draft document Creating A New Vision of Farming. These tasks can be viewed at
www.soulofag.org under the INFORMATION page. Further into that same page you
can find a process framework for setting up a consensus formation activity.
This process framework was prepared for rural church groups. It gives you an idea of how to adjust
the process to a specific constituency, drawing on your own organizational
structures and ideals. Your own creativity will suggest an appropriate
consensus formation process, here I will provide only a content framework.
BASIC VALUES
The first task for the formation
of a consensus on the values and ethics
of organic farming is to locate its most
basic values. Like all agriculture,
organic farming has the three basic goal
values, the values of its product: sufficient, healthy and sustainable food
supplies. In addition all farmers face a range of basic values which can be helped or hurt due
to their choice of tools, and by their
involvement in practices and social
institutions which define and limit their choice of tools. We can call these tool values Examples of these are
decent incomes and healthy living conditions for farmers, laborers and
neighbors, beauty of the environment and animal welfare.
GOAL VALUES
Organic and Sufficient Food
Supplies
Organic agriculture makes a unique contribution to food sufficiency by
developing, testing and retaining in actual practice ways of producing food
which are capable of adding to local food sufficiency, also called
"community food security," a sufficiency that is secured when food is
locally grown and with cultural practices with less short-term dependency on
distant and/or interruptible resources.
Comment:
The value
of sufficient food supplies for all consumers and at prices or by means which
are accessible to all, especially the honest poor belongs to agriculture as a
whole. Different forms of agriculture contribute to that value in part. Organic
agriculture's contribution is much greater than the portion of the consumer
demand it serves. Organic agriculture provides a potential escape from the
greatest threat to food sufficiency in providing locally proven models of food
production which are significantly less unstable, in crisis situations, than
industrial models easily disabled by the interruption of indispensable supplies
of seed, biocides, fertilizers and capital.
Answer
to Objections:
Recently defenders of GMOs have resuscitated
conventional attacks calling organic farming an elitist enterprise serving a
tiny up-scale market and incapable of feeding large populations. How much of
the world organic farming could feed depends on how many people want to eat
organic food, how much it would cost and how much of the resources of land,
labor, inputs and energy the world wants to devote to it. This is really an
argument about future food sources, which will be discussed under
"sustainability." Right now
organic farming does not have the job of feeding the world. But given that
populations are increasing and the form of farming which produces the highest
yields with the least use of the limited resources is often organic farming,
its future importance to sustainably sufficient food supplies is great.
Organic and Healthy
1. Organic is Delicious: That organic farms can
produce delicious fruit and vegetables
more
readily than most large conventional growers is too evident to argue about. Creating a New Vision of Farming, in its
"Third Task" talks about the importance of local foods being
delicious. Any wise parent knows this.
Get rid of the chips and candy and put out bowls of fruit and kids will eat
what is delicious. The contribution to current and future health of those children
is immeasurable.
2. Organic is Clean: The policy of organic
farming to avoid application of toxic chemical biocides is perhaps the most
outstanding public value in its professional code. Most of those biocides,
which are applied deliberately with known residues and tolerance levels set to avoid
"most" harmful side-effects,
are justified by the claim that food cannot be grown profitably, in
adequate quantities, and shipped long distances without them. It is never
denied that these residues are an ethical problem. A huge regulatory process is
expensively maintained to make this risk/benefit tight-rope walk plausibly
safe. Organic is evidence that the "necessity" of running the risks
is not so necessary after all.[2]
3. Organic is Anxiety-Free: As a direct consequence of
its refusal to use toxic chemicals,
consumers do not need to walk the risk/benefit tight-rope. The federal
regulatory process which established the "tolerances" for residues of
these toxic chemicals can produce anxiety in reasonable people wishing to eat
them.[3]
Organic Farming is
Sustainable
Creating a New Vision of Farming
distinguishes between sustainability of the end product, namely the perpetual
supplying of sufficient quantities of food and fiber, and sustainability of the
means used to produce it. Renewability of those means
and the husbanding of the renewability is key to
sustainability of the means. This is noted in "tool values" below.
The basic threat to sustainability of sheer product would only be a population
increase (or concentration in a small area) so great that available
agricultural resources could not feed the population regardless of the means
chosen. Demographic research suggests that it is the industrial displacement of
farmers and laborers from farming which leads them, via their ensuing poverty
and infant mortality , to chose larger family sizes. A form of organic farming
in developing countries which gave stable farm families assurance of a safe
future with only a few healthy children would be the best contribution to
sustainability. Organic farming contributes to this scenario also by reducing
the family's debt exposure and the threat of loss of the farm.
GENERAL TOOL
VALUES
Since
goals enjoy priority over the tools used
to achieve them, they also determine the basic values of the tools. Organic agriculture's
tools are pre-eminently those which are efficient
in the use of resources, sustainable and safe. The organic farming
community must determine its meaning of the notoriously slippery term
"efficiency." Economists have faulted the "efficiency" of
organic farming based on a notion of pecuniary efficiency which often ignores
such incredibly important resources as clean air and water. Pecuniary
efficiency is the ratio of the money required to produce a product to the
amount of money gained in selling it. A more appropriate ratio is the amount of
valued and limited natural resources (including human labor) consumed in the
production of food to the amount of human life, health, delight and well-being
produced by the entire production process. In this ratio human labor, namely
the opportunity and delight of peoples
to be involved in the growth of their own food or to earn a wage doing it, may
be as much a valued outcome as an input.
Organic is Efficient: Or can be. Because much of
organic farming is still in innovative or experimental form, it may be terribly
inefficient, especially in the use of the farmer's personal time and energy.
Studies in innovation have demonstrated repeatedly that efficiency is attained
only in the more mature stages of a productive process or organization.
Conceptually, however, it is clear that to the extent that resources used in
organic farming are renewable and actually renewed, it achieves an efficiency
which so troubles economists that they
suspect it of claiming immunity from the laws of thermodynamics. Academic
economists who measure efficiencies of productive processes often arbitrarily
ignore (or designate as "externalities") input costs such as damage
to the environment or to the health of
the laborers. They also can discount such output values as superior
quality (e.g. superior taste and nutrition), community benefits (food security,
employment) and long term values such as the retention and enrichment of a body
of knowledge about a productive process to be passed to the next generation
(e.g. the locally appropriate art of organic farming itself).
Organic is Sustainable: Here we refer to the
sustainability of the tools used in organic farming, including the labor of the
farmer and his/her helpers. The renewability of
resources in the present promises a perpetual renewability,
absent any plausible argument to the contrary. In general the prudent use of
non-renewable resources is not a direct contradiction to sustainability in
organic farming since the pace of innovation in developing renewable resources
is more likely to match the exhaustion of non-renewable resources if that pace
of exhaustion is slow. And organic farming has the greatest potential to slow
that pace. Organic farming does not have to violate the second law of
thermodynamics.
Organic is Safe: This is the safety of its
tools in their impact on workers, the environment and all living beings who
share in it. Clearly its rejection of toxic chemicals and a careful use of
organic fertilizers demonstrate organic farming's potential of being ideally
safe.
Answer to Objections:
Recent GMO community attacks on organic farming have discussed the risk
of e-coli infections from organic fertilizers, complete with quantitative gestimates
of the risk.
Here
a distinction has to be made. Inherent
risks are those unavoidably connected to a tool, such as toxic residues
when toxics are deliberately applied. Accidental
risks are risks that are usually avoidable by more careful policies. The
e-coli risks are avoidable by proper composting, the toxic risks are inherent
in the need for the chemical to be toxic. If a complete survey and mish-mash
combination of all risks were allowed, the danger of serious human diseases
being communicated via farm labor urinating on crops due to the corporate
refusal to supply adequate port-a-potties would have to be included.
SPECIFIC TOOL
VALUES
The organic farmers who contributed
to the draft Creating a New Vision of Farming did not go into the details of
their specific strategies and the values attached to them. You might want to
read the section on "specific tool
values" in the draft. In its spirit we give here just a handy taxonomy and
some suggestive examples of tool values to guide any organic community's
deliberations. Only experienced organic farmers can do an adequate job of
locating the values of their specific techniques and tools.
1. Values for those who do the work
(a) Values without which farmers
and workers will not work at all.
(b) Values without which they
will not be able to farm with excellence.
Under
(a) are adequate family income, income security, health and bearable levels of
stress. Under (b) are the knowledge and caring which make
excellence both attractive and possible.
Creating
a New Vision of Farming under (b) notes
the value of long term familiarity with local soils, weather, markets are
critical values. Organic farming, more than any other, seems to embody and
cultivate that local intimacy which is so often neglected by industrial firms.
In your deliberations you could probably list dozens of sub-values which
proceed from that local knowledge. Under "caring" it notes the
rewards which support caring, "the promise of long-term living in a safe,
beautiful and reliably productive environment."
The organic community seems so
naturally to cultivate this knowledge and caring that they may not realize how
both precious and essential they are to the excellence of what they grow and
the community they can create in the process.
2. Values Impacting on Animals and Other Living Systems.
(a) Animals Organic operations which integrate livestock tend to do so in the
scale which makes possible the caring which is the most reliable basis for farm
animal welfare which Creating a New Vision of Farming
highlights. A large animal welfare constituency supportive of organic farming
can be secured by cultivation of this caring.
(b) Other Living Systems Organic
farming has the highest potential to value the stunning beauty of the ecosystem
from soil micro flora and fauna to the diversity of wild and cultivated plants.
This is derived both from a natural reverence for this beauty and diversity and
an awareness that it can help food production.
3. Values of Farmer to Farmer Relationships
(a) Sacred Creating
a New Vision of Farming calls attention to the corrosive kind of
competition which industrial agriculture seems to cultivate. Organic
agriculture has the potential, at this time in its development, to find ways to
promote a friendship-based competition in which farmers can work in an atmosphere
of genuine love of neighbor.
(b) Useful There
has never been a time when cohesiveness among organic farmers has more purely
utilitarian values. Your deliberations on the values of organic farming need to
list and cultivate these, from technical to political. Innovative enterprises
are particularly in need to learn, without having to repeat, all the
experiences of success and failure which occur in their field. With so little help from academic
agriculturalists, organic farmers have only each other.
4. Values in Community and Consumer Relationships
Organic farming, with its presence at farmers'
markets, has practically written the text-book on how to bring farming and the
community closer together. This is an outstanding value worth constant
cultivation. The underlying value of the farmers' market for the farmer is the
"very human pleasure in being appreciated for a good product, the outcome
of one's intelligence, labor and caring." Because of the safety of its
tools, the farmer has the pleasure of living in peace with his/her community.
For the consumer there is the value of confidence and reliability from knowing
the people who grow one's food.
PRINCIPLES TO PRESERVE THE VALUES OF ORGANIC FARMING
Values are nouns, ethical principles
are complete sentences stating commitments to preserve those values. For most
of the values, which your deliberations locate, you will find that those
commitments already exist in organic farming, but often in a strictly implicit
fashion. You will have to decide when these should be made explicit and be
stated like a kind of code of professional excellence. Ethical and professional
excellence are impossible to distinguish and separate. One secures the other. Creating a New Vision of Farming lists
sets of mutual ethical principles for farmers and for society which can help
preserve family managed farming. These sets are organized to parallel the
values which they serve. It is too long to repeat here, so instead we will list
a few suggestions as to how organic farmers
might add to or rephrase those principles. Our list will parallel the
value taxonomy laid out above. Principles listed in this way are meant to
stimulate creative thought about how to make explicit your moral insights about
organic farming. Given that the principles are reciprocal, many will be require commitments from various constituencies of organic
farming.
Principles
Which Secure or Promote the Goal Values of Organic Farming;
1. Fertile land which is close
to communities and even contiguous to homes is preferably devoted to organic
agriculture (due to values of sufficiency, safety, etc.).
2. Organic farmers should farm
in a way which is safe to close neighbors.
3. Safety of organic foods must
not rely merely on "certification" rules.
4. Organic farming must not abandon
concern for sustainability.
5. Organic farming's ability to
preserve and regenerate agricultural resources must not be abandoned with the
growing scale of its farms.
6. Regulation and education in
agriculture must encourage the growth and prosperity of organic farming and
enhance its ability to protect the health of the soil and safety of its
products.
Principles
which Guide the Tools of Organic Farming:
General Tool
Principles
1. The working and economic
conditions of organic farmers and their workers must be rewarding and healthy
enough to assure that the vocation will not be abandoned.
2. Because "caring"
is at the heart of organic farming, workers must be treated with dignity and
generosity so that they too will care about the values of organic farming.
3. Organic farming must pursue
efficiency, humanely defined, while allowing for "inefficient"
experimentation.
4. No experiment which involves
serious risk to the public or to the reputation of organic farming should be
allowed. (Or: All experiments should be conducted safely.)
5. Public agricultural schools
should support organic farming experimentation.
6. Organic farming must not
treat important human and natural impacts as "externalities."
7. The body of local knowledge
of organic farming must be preserved locally.
8. Organic farming must
exercise superior care about accidental risks involved in its innovative tools
or procedures.
9. Larger and growing organic
farms must carefully preserve in its managers the familiarity and intimacy with
the fields and crops which secure the excellence of organic products and
minimize its impacts.
10. Beauty and diversity should
remain a hallmark of organic operations.
Specific Tool
Principles
A. Farmers and Workers
1. The continuity of farming
organically, with the local knowledge and caring which distinguish it, should
be secured in local policy, including economic incentives.
2. Toward the goal of # 1, the
entry of young farmers into organic farming should be encouraged..
3. Consideration for the
health, housing and schooling of worker families should be present
B. Impacts on Animals and Other Living Systems
1. Although used and even
consumed in production, natural beings, plants and animals are the sacred gifts
of Creation, given for our use, not abuse. They are worthy in themselves of
being treated with respect. Their diversity and the harmony of their
coexistence are prima facie good and should be protected.[4]
2. The reputation of organic
farming's respect for nature is precious and should be guarded jealously.
3. Needless or trivially
profitable harm to animals used in integrated organic operations should be
treated as wrong in itself and an inevitable path to compromising the
cleanliness of farm products and the health of the environment.
4. The effort of organic
farmers to protect animals and the environment deserve public support.
C. Farmer to Farmer Relations
1. Organic farmers must avoid
aping the destructive forms of competition found in industrial agriculture.
2. Organic farmers should seek
amicable relationships with conventional farmers and help them make marginal improvement
in the direction of less toxic farming.
3. Organic farmers should join
together for mutual help and for cohesive communal and political action.
D. Farmer--Community Relations
1. Organic farmers should
consider the feasibility of additional efforts to encourage the community to
know them personally and even visit their farms.
2. Organic farmers and the
community should make mutual efforts to make the proximity of farming
operations to their homes enjoyable.
3. Community leaders should
recognize that economic hardship of farmers reduces their ability to
accommodate community needs.
E. Farmer--Consumer Relations
1. Organic farmers and their
community supporters should engage in educational efforts concerning the
consumer values of their crops.
2. Organic farmers should attempt
to inform consumers about the need for the "premium prices" of their
products.
3. "Community Supported
Agriculture" arrangements should be seriously examined not merely for
economic reasons, but to enhance the friendship and trust between consumers and
organic farmers.
4. Organic farmers at farmers'
markets should consider having educational displays or events about the value
of their products for consumers.
CONCLUSION
In many
ways organic farming in
Now is the time to act!
[2] Standard applied ethics has had a long tradition of justifying choices of tools that have unintended but foreseen actual harms (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy to cure cancer) or known risk of harm, such as pain killers which could shorten a patient's life. The risk is borne for the benefit intended. But the application of this principle, sometimes called the principle of double effect, or risk/benefit analysis, always supposes that there is no alternative tool which can achieve the good effect without incurring the harmful effect or running the risk thereof. The entire regulatory process in the federal FIFRA legislation is based on the notion that organic farming cannot feed the nation.
[3] Toxic residue tolerances on food are usually set to fall significantly below the "safe" levels of ingestion by some "average consumer". In some cases this is determined, for example, by taking all the grapefruit consumed in this country in a year and dividing it by all the consumers producing a ridiculously low number of grapefruit per actual devoted grapefruit eater. How many of them would buy a grapefruit that was advertised to be safe, provided one eats only six or seven a year?
[4] This principle is directly quoted from Creating a New Vision of Farming. Significant numbers of organic farmers are vegetarians for ethical reasons, others are not for equally ethical reasons. The reader may wish to consult the footnote in Creating a New Vision of Farming at this passage for a way of thinking about this difficult issue and the problem of animal rights in general. Also, it would be worthwhile to read there the remaining ethical principles on the treatment of animals.