EDTE 233 Teaching Problem-Solving with Educational Technology Final Project Rubric |
Levels: | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | Score and Comments | ||||
Criteria: |
|||||||||
A. Content, including both the strategy and the technology (tool) |
Information is cursory and/or incorrect. Minimal grasp of content. Strategy or technology. absent. |
Some solid information presented however some information cursory and/or incorrect. Minimal connection made between strategy and technology. |
Information is mostly correct and clearly presented. Some connections made between strategy and technology. |
Information is well presented, clear, and correct throughout. Innovative ideas for teaching and learning; excellent connection between strategy and technology. |
|||||
B. Meaningful Development of Ideas |
Ideas are unclear and/or undeveloped. |
Ideas not fully explained nor supported by evidence. Repetitive details. |
Ideas clear and shows some depth, supported by relevant evidence. Contains adequate details. |
Depth and complexity of thought supported by rich, pertinent details; strong supporting evidence for high-level idea development. |
|||||
C. Clarity of Presentation |
Unclear, no apparent logical order, unfocused. |
Content is loosely connected, transitions lack clarity. |
Sequence of information is mostly well-organized, more clarity needed with transitions. |
Development of thesis is clear through the use of specific and appropriate example, transitions clear and create a succinct and even flow. |
|||||
D. Delivery |
Did not attempt to engage audience. Monotone speaker seemed uninterested in material. Time not divided equally, one person does all of the talking for the group. |
Minimal attempt to engage audience. Little eye contact, fast speaking rate, little expression, mumbling, audience unable to hear speaker clearly, not everyone in the group speaks. |
Engaged audience and held their attention most of the time by remaining on topic and presenting with enthusiasm. Clear articulation of ideas, buts lacks some confidence with material, everyone in group speaks but time not divided equally. |
Engaged audience and held their attention throughout with creative articulation, enthusiasm, and clearly focused presentation. Exceptional confidence with material displayed through poise, clear articulation, eye contact, and enthusiasm. All group members speak and time is approximately equally divided. |
|||||
E. Length of Presentation |
Greatly exceeding or falling short of 20 minutes. No time provided for questions. |
Exceeding or falling short of 20 minutes. Limited time for questions. |
Remained close to 20 minutes. Some time provided for questions. |
Presented within the allotted time. Time provided for questions. |
|||||
F. Handout and supporting materials |
No handout, no references. |
Handout lack important details about the project. Few references and/or some incorrect references. |
Handout is mostly complete, all necessary information included. Includes relevant references. |
Handout is complete, all necessary information is included. References indicate substantial research. |
|||||
G. Connection to Standards |
No connection to standards is apparent. |
Weakly connected to standards. |
Clear connection to standards. |
Clear connection to standards, selected standards linked to researched references. |
|||||